seemysite

Our new Deepseek-based AI states "Chiefs vs Eagles? ... How Predictable"

Super Bowl predictions from our new Deepseek-based AI trained to be better at forecasting

Share this post

Nobody can predict the future however at Lightning Rod Labs we are training AI to provide it its . With as much as date news and a little but tough 14 Billion parameter design, our AI is boldly anticipating the unforeseeable. Join us as we try to respond to humanity's most difficult concerns.

Super Bowl Sunday is nearly upon us and, simply as two years earlier, we have the Chiefs against the Eagles. The spread currently sits at Chiefs -1.5 with an over-under of 48.5. While the statistics are well studied, there remain many pushing concerns that are less easy to determine. Our business, Lightning Rod Labs, has been mining questions from locations like polymarket.com and training a large language design to be better at forecasting the future (and have actually seen some intriguing enhancements - research study paper incoming). This week we turned its cold, determining eye at the Super Bowl to see if it can offer us some insight into the finer points of what we can anticipate this Sunday.

For more updates from the AI world register for my newsletter!

Background

Our AI is a 14 billion parameter model which is actually on the smaller side. (Some quotes recommend ChatGPT has 1.8 TRILLION criteria and trained utilizing 8000 H100 GPUs. We utilized 8.) Additionally, photorum.eclat-mauve.fr its knowledge cutoff is from numerous months ago so we have built an "agentic pipeline" to do news retrieval, summarization, and ranking. With each concern we offer the news and watch as the AI reasons its way through unknown area to make its finest forecast possible.

And Now ... The Important Questions

We postured the following concerns to our AI and evaluated its reaction. While we have actually seen prediction improvements from our training, utilize these price quotes for prop wagering at your own peril.

Will Travis Kelce propose to Taylor Swift after the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 5% opportunity

And so it appears this Sunday will not be a romantic one. Our AI thinks Taylor and Travis' relationship is rock strong, however a little too private for a post-Super Bowl proposal. Plus got ta consider if the Chiefs lose. That would be an awkward proposition ...

First, I'll take a look at the bottom lines from the articles. Travis has remained in a relationship with Taylor considering that 2023. He's a huge football star, and she's been supportive of his career, bphomesteading.com attending his video games. They appear to have a strong, public relationship, and Taylor has even welcomed her buddies and family to the Super Bowl, showing her dedication.

Some fans are thrilled, while others, especially Swifties, are a bit uncertain, especially given comments Travis made about Donald Trump participating in the Super Bowl. That has actually triggered some Swifties to question how ideal Travis is for Taylor. However, the couple seems to be keeping their relationship personal and not attending to the speculation straight.

I believe the bottom lines are the speculation and his evasive answers. While he's plainly in a relationship and the Super Bowl is an important event, the chances and his actions recommend it's more of a possibility rather than a certainty. I 'd estimate a low likelihood, maybe around 5%, thinking about all elements.

Will the Eagles do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the extremely bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 79% opportunity

No Jason Kelce hasn't stopped the Eagles from utilizing their signature "tush-push" relocation, now its just a different front-tush being pressed. Will an AI comprehend what a "tush-push" is? Does an AI even know what a "tush" is? Will it factor in that the Chiefs stopped (controversy aside) Josh Allen's similar attempts? Looks like our AI believes they'll be using Jalen Hurts 600-pound squat and strong legs and lower body (Does our AI have a crush on Jalen Hurts?) time and again during this game.

Alright, I'm attempting to determine the likelihood that the Eagles will do more than 5 "tush-pushes" throughout the Super Bowl. First, I need to comprehend what exactly a "tush-push" is. From the short articles, it looks like it's a technique where the quarterback, in this case Jalen Hurts, utilizes his legs and lower body strength to push off defenders. It's compared to pressing a heavy box, so it's a physical maneuver that requires strength and method.

Article 3 dives into the physics of the "tush-push." It explains how Hurts utilizes his leg strength, having actually done a 600-pound squat, to execute the move. The post mentions that the Eagles have a 90% success rate with this strategy, which is pretty high. ... I also need to think of the defensive techniques of the Chiefs. If the Chiefs know the Eagles' "tush-push" technique, they may change their defense appropriately, which could either increase or reduce the number of times the Eagles utilize it.

Considering that more than five looks like a significant number but possible offered their self-confidence, I would approximate a probability around 60-70% possibility. This accounts for their preparation, self-confidence in the method, and the probability that they'll utilize it a number of times, particularly if it's reliable early on.

Will Kendrick Lamar diss Donald Trump throughout the halftime show performance?

AI Final Prediction: 65% possibility

While our AI might not resemble us when it pertains to consciousness, a soul, or any physical manifestation, it certainly has viewpoints on Kendrick Lamar. It was quite uncertain, waffling backward and forward, but in the end it believes Kendrick isn't going to back down from a fight.

From the articles, I see that Kendrick Lamar has a history of slamming Trump. He's done this in his tunes, like "The Heart Part 4," and even made a declaration throughout a previous halftime show when Trump was present in 2018. That appears significant since it shows he's done it previously, so perhaps he'll do it again. But wait, looking at more recent articles, it mentions that Lamar is moving far from political declarations and focusing more on personal expression. That might imply he's less likely to attend to Trump this time.

However, he's also involved in a fight with Drake, which might give him reasons to make some public statements, even if they're not political. Another point is the legal concerns surrounding his track "Not Like Us." There's a defamation match from Drake, so perhaps he bewares about including any controversial songs in the efficiency. But given that he won the Grammys for that track, he might still desire to perform it, even if it's uncertain.

Considering Trump is attending this Super Bowl, which is a high-profile event, Lamar might feel compelled to make a statement. However, the NFL tends to avoid political declarations throughout the halftime show, so there's a risk that such content might be restricted or softened.

On the other hand, Lamar has a performance history of making vibrant carry on huge phases. He's the very first solo rap act to heading the halftime show, which might offer him more innovative liberty. Plus, his previous habits recommends he's not shy about expressing his opinions, even in public performances.

But I likewise remember reading that Lamar expressed tiredness about slamming Trump, comparing it to beating a dead horse. That could indicate he's less encouraged to raise Trump this time around, particularly if he's concentrating on his feud with Drake. In summary, weighing all factors-past habits, present shifts in focus, legal issues, and the occasion's context-the probability appears to be reasonably high, maybe around 65%.

Will Andy Reid consume a cheeseburger on screen after the super bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 25% opportunity

Lets be sincere, Andy Reid likes cheeseburgers. And who does not? Will the reality that our AI has never ever tasted the juicy deliciousness of a fresh hamburger taint its prediction? Looks like theres rather of a possibility that if the chiefs taste success, Andy will taste Angus Beef.

From the articles, I see that Terry Bradshaw made a joke about Andy Reid consuming a cheeseburger throughout a Super Bowl celebration. Bradshaw later said sorry for the joke, stating he didn't imply to cause offense and that he in fact found it amusing himself. Reid seemed to take it in stride, which may suggest he's the type to laugh it off instead of getting upset.

Taking a look at the short articles, it discusses that Andy Reid is a food enthusiast and enjoys cheeseburgers. There's an article particularly about his love for food, which suggests that he's a person who takes pleasure in consuming, particularly with his team. So, if there were strategies to commemorate after the Super Bowl, it's possible he would take part in a cheeseburger, particularly if the scenario is on screen for a celebration.

Will the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl be tails?

AI Final Prediction: 50% possibility

"Tails never fails?" You can't fool the machines !! Betters leading up to the superbowl have actually been anticipating the coin toss and 53% are predicting heads due to it being heads 3 of the last 4 super bowls. Potentially rewarding? Maybe. Statistically incongruent? Certainly. Luckily our AI can't be tricked and thinks anything can happen when that coin enters the air.

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the possibility that the opening coin toss in the Super Bowl will be tails. I understand annunciogratis.net that a coin toss is supposed to be 50/50, however there's some historic information that might influence this prediction.

First, I check out the posts provided. They all discuss the historic data of Super Bowl coin tosses. It seems like tails has come up more typically than heads historically. Specifically, in 58 Super Bowls, tails has actually been the result 30 times, which has to do with 52%, while heads has been 28 times, which is about 48%. So, based purely on history, tails has a small edge, however it's not a big distinction.

However, I remember that the outcome of a coin toss is typically considered random. The minor historical edge for tails could be due to chance. But when making forecasts, akropolistravel.com in some cases people weigh historical information even if it's not statistically substantial. So, I ought to consider whether this historic bias ought to affect the likelihood.

After believing about it, I decide that while the historic data reveals a minor choice for tails, it's not statistically substantial enough to move the possibility far from 0.5. So, I'll go with 0.5 as the probability, acknowledging that the slight historic edge exists however doesn't bypass the truth that each toss is an independent 50/50 event.

Will the referees cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl?

AI Final Prediction: 1% chance

We get it, you think the refs like Patrick Mahomes and are gon na assist him win. If I wasn't born and raised in Kansas City (I promise we didn't inject pro-Kansas City training data) I would most likely think the exact same. BUT, its authorities now because our AI states the possibilities are just 1% (hmmmm ... 1% is still kind of high when it pertains to fraud on a nationwide scale). Looks like the Chiefs will have to win fair and square!

AI Reasoning:

Okay, so I'm attempting to find out the probability that the referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl. Hmm, that's a pretty serious accusation. Let me break this down. First, I'm seeing a great deal of posts that speak about conspiracy theories recommending referees are biased towards the Chiefs. People are indicating some doubtful hire recent games, especially the AFC Championship Game. That does appear to spark some uncertainty. I can see why fans may get irritated when their team loses due to what they perceive as bad officiating.

But then I read that the NFL Referees Association and the Commissioner, Roger Goodell, have both dismissed these claims as "preposterous" and "ludicrous." They state there's no proof of systematic bias. That's a strong declaration from the people in charge. If they're denying it, it may mean there's no real basis or they would have addressed it differently if there was some truth to it.

Looking at the articles, several sources like [1], [5], [6], [7], [8], and [9] all report that the officials are against these claims, and some even called them insulting. They likewise discussed that statistical analysis does not reveal any pattern of favoritism towards the Chiefs. For example, Mike Pereira from FOX said information shows the Chiefs have been penalized more since 2022. That's interesting due to the fact that if they were getting special treatment, you might expect fewer charges, right?

...

So, putting all of it together, the possibility that referees will cheat to assist the Chiefs win the Super Bowl is probably extremely low. Maybe not zero due to the fact that you can't rule out every possibility, but very unlikely.

Summary

There you have it everyone, is it even worth enjoying the video game still? I guess I'll need to wait and see how the game turns out before we release this upon the stock exchange. Fingers crossed for a great game! And hello, if it ends up our AI was incorrect about whatever, a minimum of it can gain from this.