Update 'Employment Lawyer Discusses what Trump Offer to Federal Employees to Resign Would Do'

Employment-Lawyer-Discusses-what-Trump-Offer-to-Federal-Employees-to-Resign-Would-Do.md

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+<br>MICHEL MARTIN, HOST: Federal staff members have till February 6 to choose whether to willingly leave their jobs. The U.S. Office of Personnel Management, OPM, notified employees on Tuesday that if they hand in their [resignation](https://robbarnettmedia.com) by next Thursday - that's less than a week from now - most will be permitted to depart and be paid until completion of September. Michelle Bercovici is an [employment](https://arbeitswerk-premium.de) attorney who represents federal staff members as a large part of her practice, so I asked her for her analysis about what OPM's postponed resignation program would actually mean.MICHELLE BERCOVICI: I really don't consider it so much an offer. I think it's a request to resign with a vague promise that, potentially, you could be kept in administrative [leave status](https://wiselinkjobs.com) for as much as 8 months - however no guarantees.MARTIN: Some people have actually been utilizing the term buyout to explain what this is due to the fact that there appears to be the offer of administrative leave for approximately 8 months if you take this deal. So is it a buyout?BERCOVICI: I would never explain it as a buyout. I think that's a very misleading term to utilize in this situation. When you think about a buyout, there's generally some sort of composed agreement or a concrete offer to offer an advantage in exchange for waiving particular rights. That is not the case here.MARTIN: If customers ask you for your suggestions, what are you telling them?BERCOVICI: First thing we tell them is workout severe caution. There are no warranties consisted of in this e-mail. The only thing I can tell you for particular is that if you change your mind, the agency's probably not going to let you withdraw that resignation, and you are basically quiting control over a lot.MARTIN: Exists some classification of employee who you believe this might benefit? Maybe they're close to retirement. Is somebody like that might this be an appealing offer?BERCOVICI: Folks near retirement require to be the most [mindful](https://ddsbyowner.com) because leaving earlier than intended can have major effects, potentially, on their benefits.MARTIN: Let me just play a clip from the White House press secretary, Karoline Leavitt. She told [reporters](http://app.vellorepropertybazaar.in) that this is a bargain for people who don't wish to go back to the office. Let me simply play it.(SOUNDBITE OF ARCHIVED RECORDING)KAROLINE LEAVITT: This is a suggestion to federal workers that they have to return in - to work. And if they don't, then they have the alternative to resign, and this administration is really kindly offering to pay them for eight months.MARTIN: You're shaking your head no.BERCOVICI: It just - in a manner, it breaks my heart that federal workers are being jerked around like this. It sends out a signal to me that this return-to-office order is in bad faith, that it's designed to get folks who work truly difficult to resign. I think it's trying to pull the wool over a lot of individuals's eyes since there are no assurances. And these are individuals who enjoy their task. They enjoy the objective of the firm. They work hard. And right now, they're facing extremely difficult options, specifically if they're remote. I imply, it's extremely coercive.MARTIN: You state it's coercive. Because?BERCOVICI: Essentially, if you're someone who lives in Oregon and has been informed to report to D.C. otherwise we're going to fire you, they might feel that they have no option than to take this option.MARTIN: Do you anticipate legal obstacles simply to the deal itself? And if so, on what grounds?BERCOVICI: This offer, to be truthful, is so unprecedented that I believe a lot of us are still trying to determine what to do with it. I'm not sure if the offer itself may be challengeable. I think the  is the execution of these terms. I'm not mindful of any [authority](https://www.allgovtjobz.pk) that exists today for  [employment](https://ura.cc/josharmijo) OPM to order agencies to provide this number of individuals administrative leave. So I believe it is very much possibly setting the phase for obstacles due to the fact that I feel OPM has actually vastly surpassed their authority.MARTIN: That is Michelle Bercovici. She is a work attorney with the Alden Law Group here in Washington, D.C. Thank you a lot for joining us.BERCOVICI: Thank you so much for having me here.<br>
+<br>Copyright © 2025 NPR. All rights scheduled. Visit our website terms of usage and authorizations pages at www.npr.org for additional details.<br>
+<br>NPR transcripts are developed on a rush deadline by an NPR professional. This text might not remain in its last form and may be updated or modified in the future. Accuracy and accessibility might vary. The authoritative record of NPR's programming is the audio record.<br>